A Wisconsin resident earned the right to sue FMC Corp. for its failure to warn her husband of the potential risks of terminal cancer. Her husband died in 2004 from malignant mesothelioma, an incurable cancer caused by asbestos exposure. For more on the story, read:
A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit filed by a former inmate of Leavenworth Prison for asbestos exposure. Asbestos was confirmed to be at the prison in 1994, but Smith claims he was exposed to asbestos by the prison in 2003. The appeals court said that the Byron Smith should have the chance to prove that the prison warden and his staff were aware or should have been aware of its presence in 2003 before negligently exposing inmates to the asbestos.
For more see:
Carolin K. Shining
Trial lawyer for workers
As their own greed lays them low, AIG and its Wall Street accomplices are scurrying for cover by backing AB 298 (Tran), which would shield them from accountability for their malfeasance and eliminate class action lawsuits in California.
The main backer of AB 298 is the Civil Justice Association of California (CJAC), a front group for AIG and large banks which have received billions in taxpayer bail-outs. CJAC also represents oil, tobacco, drug, insurance and auto companies — all of which seek to evade justice by restricting consumers' rights to sue them for their wrongdoing.
This is nothing new for AIG and its former chairman, Hank Greenberg, who have been perhaps the largest funders of the effort to restrict access to federal and state courts, giving $25 million to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for legal "reform" and to limit regulation.
AB 298 will be heard on Tuesday, March 31st!
Chris Dharmakirti sent a message to the members of BAN ASBESTOS USE IN SRI LANKA AND SARC REGION on Facebook:
Subject: Please help by writing to the sri lankan newspapers about the proposed asbestos factory on templers
We need all our friends to wage a "letters to the editor" campaign asking the local municipal authorities and the board of investment to stop the proposed construction of an asbestos factory on templers road mt lavinia, one of the most populated residential areas of colombo's beach suburb. Please do write to your local papers about the risk of locating a factory with outdated equipment and little or no pollution control and ther poor handling of asbestos materials. You may use information gleaned from our factsheets on this group site to boslter your argument. Please write to the local business commmunity leaders too, including the chamber of commerce and others about this. Thank you.
To reply to this message, follow the link below:
In a landmark ruling, a New Jersey court has found that asbestos-manufacturers Chrysler and Honeywell (aka Bendix) are not entitled to force the family of a man killed by asbestos cancer to undergo an autopsy.
Asbestos manufacturers have often sought to force autopsies, but have had their requests turned down nearly universally because of the right of privacy and religious believes of the deceased and his or her family. This case was unique as Chrysler appealed the lower court ruling.
One wonders how much money Chrysler, which has cut over 25,000 jobs in the past two years and struggled with collapsing sales, spent on fighting the plaintiffs' family to force an autopsy…
For a complete report, see: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202429181114
If you or a loved one is fighting an asbestos diseased, call me at 213-689-3278 to discuss your rights and legal options.
In a complex ruling, the 1st Appellate District ruled that Sheppard Mullen, a large national law firm, cannot represent an asbestos claimant committee due to earlier representation in a lawsuit between Kelly Moore (makers of Paco asbestos-containing drywall muds) and Union Carbide (a fiber mining and supply company). This case represents a step away from recent court rulings liberalizing conflicts law and permitting the use of "chinese walls" to segregate lawyers working on different issues and from different offices.
You can read the opinion for 60 days at: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A120912.PDF
The Southwestern Law School recently sponsored a symposium on asbestos litigation. Unfortunately, most of the articles published are a screed for a handful of insurance carriers and defense litigators seeking to end the litigation and keep the victims of asbestos poisoning from getting their day in court. Here is the link, but caveat emptor. Note: One particularly misleading set of articles was funded by the "Coalition for Litigation Justices, Inc." This is a group funded by the tobacco industry and asbestos defense lobbyists and their concept of "justice" means that injured people cannot sue them for wrongdoing:
Almost under cover of darkness, Crown Cork & Seal is seeking state laws to limit its liability for the acquisition of Mundet Corporation, one of the country's largest manufacturers of thermal asbestos containing insulation in 1963. CC&S has always attempted to fight liability for this purchase (see http://www.answers.com/topic/john-conway) but many courts across the country have ruled otherwise.
Unable to get victories in court, CC&S is seeking to "back door" these policies in smaller states like South Dakota and North Dakota. If you live in these locations, please call your representatives and tell them, no bail-outs for polluters and companies who shirk their responsibilities and duties.
For more on CC&S and other asbestos manufacturers, go to http://www.paulandhanley.com.
This excellent article lays out the pros and cons of layoffs — more con than pro. Employers who have brains and hearts should think twice before simply throwing bodies out the door: